The Marin Post

The Voice of the Community

Blog Post < Previous | Next >

.

CO$T Recommendations for Nov. 3, 2020 Voting


These are challenging times. The pandemic recession has seriously damaged the financial health of our California's citizenry and businesses, with many on the brink of collapse. In an unprecedented development, the North Bay Leadership Council issued a policy statement opposing ALL taxes on the November 2020 ballots and the Bay Area Council announced it is funding a major ad campaign to defeat taxes across the region.

Your November 3, 2020 election ballot includes several tax measures, local elected offices and statewide propositions whose outcome could significantly affect Marin taxpayer-voters.


The Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers recommends the following votes:


MEASURE R: San Rafael 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Increase

Vote NO

This additional ¼ cent 9-year sales tax hurts those who can afford it least. Because it’s a general tax, Measure R needs only a majority, not 2/3, approval and there are few constraints on how the money is spent. In effect, it fills a tiny bit of a pension hole that will keep getting bigger because pension return assumptions are unrealistic and salaries keep growing. This is a long-term issue that San Rafael Measure R can’t fix. The City must urgently address its pension problems, downsize headcount and compensation, and consolidate costly emergency services with other cities. They can’t tax their way out of this, but they will try.

San Rafael residents are downsizing their expenses to live within their means. San Rafael City leadership should do the same. Vote NO.

Learn More:

Read CO$T’s Argument Against Measure R and Rebuttal published in the November 2020 Marin County Voter Education Guide.



MEASURE M: Tamalpais Union High School District Parcel Tax

YOU DECIDE

This $469 per parcel is a straight renewal of all parcel taxes supporting the Tam Union District (Redwood, Tamalpais, Drake, San Andreas and Tamiscal). It replaces the existing $16.8 million parcel tax, extending it 9 years with 3% annual escalators.

CO$T decided to neither endorse nor oppose Measure M. We oppose key features of this tax. But Tam Union faces a major downsizing if it doesn’t replace some or all of the revenue of the current parcel taxes expiring June 2022. How to vote? It’s your choice. Here’s what to consider:

Reasons You Might Vote for Measure M:

Significant cuts will be necessary if TUHSD doesn't replace much of the current parcel tax revenue (comprising 17% of the district budget) by June 30, 2022.

Time is running short. If this tax fails TUHSD will likely try again. But when? One possibility is a special election in 2021, which CO$T would likely oppose because that's expensive to run and generates a low turnout skewed to proponents. The other option is the March 2022 CA primary election, which is so close to the sunset of the current parcel tax that the District would have to prepare a detailed plan for layoffs that would occur if the tax measure fails.

Straight renewal. Measure M simply extends existing parcel taxes and escalators for 9 years. Citing expected enrollment declines, CO$T helped defeat proposed jumps in the parcel tax rate, including March 2020's Measure B and preliminary plans to put TWO parcel tax measures on the Nov 2020 ballot.

Reasons You Might Vote Against Measure M:

It's regressive. Under this flat parcel tax, each property pays the same whether it's a mall or a studio condo. CO$T advocates a per square foot parcel tax sized to lower the burden on most homes while raising it on the largest commercial properties.

It grows 3% every year despite big enrollment declines over the 9 year tax (per district consultants).

Admin expense efficiencies should be considered. Marin has 19 school district administrative entities. Consolidation or shared services could trim taxpayers' burden without harming students.

Inclusive approach needed. Taxpayer-voters aren't just a cash register. The district must engage the whole community in a dialogue about tax affordability, district priorities and more inclusive decision making.


PROPOSITION 15:

Vote NO

This "split roll" state-wide property tax initiative would repeal part of Prop. 13. A once in a generation overhaul of CA's property tax code, prop 15 is a huge tax increase, potentially raising over $12 billion annually in new tax revenue. It does this by reassessing commercial properties to current market value. Prop 15 would raise taxes on a wide variety of businesses and could be especially crushing to small ones.

Prop 15 hurts businesses that own their buildings and also those that lease space (they'll face higher rents or pay the higher property taxes outright under “triple net" lease agreements). Businesses will try to pass on the higher costs to consumers; if they can't pass the cost to consumers, businesses, especially some ones, may collapse. Prop 15 is also widely viewed as a first step toward eroding or repealing prop 13's homeowner protections. To hear the pro and con arguments from campaign leaders, watch the video of CO$T's Zoom forum on Prop 15.

Also check out Howard Jarvis Taxpayers' Association's one page pitch for the No vote; CalTax offers a comprehensive analysis.


PROPOSITION 19:

Vote NO

This is another big state-wide tax increase in disguise - potentially raising over $2 billion annually from CA homeowners and chipping away at homeowners' property tax protections. Prop 19 is a second try at a previously rejected proposition intended to gin up home sales and real estate commissions. The ugly twist this time around: Prop 19 repeals 1986's prop 58 (which voters overwhelmingly approved), allowing parents to transfer a home to their children without an increase in property tax. Prop 19's superficial appeal is that it offers the ability of age 55+ homeowners to maintain their prop 13 base value while moving anywhere in the state up to three times. But this positive comes at the expense of a huge new tax on the next generation, which has already been repeatedly fleeced by CA tax policies.

If prop 19 passes, the prop 13 base value on an inherited home would soar to full market value. If the heir does not make the home his principal residence within 1 year. Often this is just not feasible. In other instances, the heir depends on renting out the home short or long term as a much-needed income source. Prop 19 will force the next generation to sell inherited homes, raising up to $2 billion in new taxes and robbing them of the family home and financial security.

Realtors should stop trying to improve their economics at taxpayers' expense.


Vote for Change Candidates at MMWD:

Vote For Chris Hobbs and Mark Lubamersky

CO$T is endorsing Chris Hobbs for the MMWD Board in Division 5 (Belvedere, Tiburon, Strawberry, Corte Madera, and part of Larkspur) and Mark Lubamersky in Division 2 (San Rafael). They are not running as a slate but each sees the urgent need to change policies that contribute to skyrocketing water rates and wildfire risk.

Both Hobbs and Lubamersky are committed to much more aggressive fuel load reduction in the watershed. They also want to review the fairness of the recently enacted Capital Maintenance Fee (CMF), which resulted in a huge new meter-size based fee in 2019 (the legality of which CO$T contested in a legal complaint which has recently advanced to a class action filing). Both Lubamersky and Hobbs call for much better transparency and prudent fiscal management with the rate payers in focus. Neither will participate in the gold-plated healthcare package that current board members enjoy, which is a costly perk that's highly unusual for Marin's elected officials. Both are open to enacting term limits at the board, which currently has several extremely long serving members.

Chris Hobbs brings to the board superb financial expertise, a professional skill that distinguishes him relative to current directors. Mark Lubamersky contributes a commitment to fairly representing the interests of the broad community as demonstrated in prior San Rafael public service roles. Learn more about Chris Hobbs here and Mark Lubamersky here.


CO$T Endorses Mandy Downing for Tamalpais Union High School District Board

CO$T endorses Mandy Downing and urges voters to vote for her ONLY – what’s known as a “bullet vote” -- even though two positions on the board are open for this election. A bullet approach amplifies your vote for Ms. Downing and increases her chances in a field that includes 2 incumbents and 3 challengers (who would normally split among them the votes of people who want change).

CO$T believes the District -- which is struggling with yet another parcel tax measure, fiscal challenges and a hasty attempt to rename Drake High School -- would benefit from new blood. Ms. Downing advocates important policy changes that CO$T favors. For example, while Mandy supports Measure M (see above), if it fails she is open to looking at a fairer per square foot parcel tax. She also says she would oppose using future taxpayer money to hire polling consultants (favoring instead a conversation with the larger community about what it would support). She believes in a balanced budget that does not depend on reserve spending and recognizes this may involve some hard decisions about spending priorities as well as looking for any additional revenue sources.

Mandy is committed to scrutinizing the budget with an eye to maximizing the educational impact of available taxpayer dollars; she wants the district to define its priorities and align spending accordingly, including exploring opportunities for shared services and collaborations. Mandy would also like the board to be more active in pension reform at the District and State levels.

For much-needed change at Tam Union, CO$T urges a bullet vote for Mandy Downing. Learn more about Mandy at votersdedge.org , on Facebook at Mandy Downing 4 Tam and Instagram at mandydowning4tam


CO$T endorses Dr. Paul da Silva for the College of Marin Board.

Dr. da Silva is a recently retired biology professor. Since no current board members have inside, on the ground experience at the college, Dr. da Silva would bring to the board an important perspective and workable ideas for solving vexing problems. He's an independent thinker who would bring new ideas to a board several of whose members have served quite a while.

Dr. da Silva’s careful habits as a scientist appear to carry over into his approach to the college’s problems generally, and he has budgeting experience as a former department chair. His 16-page response to COST’s questionnaire provided insightful critiques of current approaches and detailed suggestions for improvement for academic programs, expenditures, and long-term priorities. He specifically identifies reducing large construction cost over-runs and use of outside consultants as important opportunities to make taxpayer money go further. In another community-friendly initiative, Dr. da Silva backs lower facility rental fee charges (e.g., meeting space) for low-budget groups that disseminate knowledge and information.

Paul has an excellent website that is well worth reading. The "Why I'm Running" page gives specific examples of COM missteps that were costly to education and taxpayers. This helps us understand how Paul's experience and insight could guide better future decisions. It's clear that a vote for Paul is a vote for much-needed change.

Dr. da Silva’s careful approach and inside perspective earn him a place on the College of Marin board. Vote FOR Paul da Silva for College of Marin Board.